CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SCORES : HOW TO READ THE SCORES
- Share via
Here are California Assessment Program writing scores earned by eighth-graders in some Los Angeles County public schools last spring.
The previous year’s scores are also provided for comparison purposes, although CAP officials warn against reading too much into one-year variations.
The scaled score is a combination of results on each of the various types of writing tasks assigned. The average score in the state was 259, up four points over last year’s score, while the average for students in Los Angeles County was 236, representing a six-point rise.
Relative rank is a way to compare a district or a school with another that is similar in terms of student socioeconomic makeup and students’ ability to speak, read and write English fluently, as well as how often those students move from school to school. The value listed is the school’s percentile rank within its comparison group.
State rank shows the school or district’s ranking (on a score of 1 to 99), comparing its scores to those of every other school or district in California.
Other scores will be appearing in the Glendale section of The Times on Thursday.
Related Story, Page A3
CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SCORES
Burbank Unified
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 268 61 57 88-89 271 68 66
LUTHER BURBANK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 266 76 56 88-89 280 88 71
JORDAN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 247 57 41 88-89 231 35 29
MUIR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 282 49 69 88-89 290 63 78
Castaic Union
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 266 66 55 88-89 278 74 72
CASTAIC MIDDLE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 266 66 56 88-89 278 74 69
Eastside Union
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 260 43 51 88-89 240 46 38
EASTSIDE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 46 38
Glendale Unified
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 258 59 49 88-89 269 78 63
ROOSEVELT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 215 53 17 88-89 211 49 17
ROSEMONT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 295 75 77 88-89 292 64 80
TOLL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 259 53 50 88-89 270 83 64
WILSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 247 46 41 88-89 287 91 76
Gorman
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 --- --- --- 88-89 --- --- ---
GORMAN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 --- --- --- 88-89 --- --- ---
Hughes-Elizabeth Lakes
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 220 8 19 88-89 274 51 69
HUGHES-ELIZABETH LAKES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 220 8 20 88-89 274 51 66
Keppel Union
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 246 60 40 88-89 242 31 40
ALMONDALE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 240 51 35 88-89 237 28 35
DAISY GIBSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 267 74 57
LAKE LOS ANGELES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 257 80 49 88-89 263 47 59
Lancaster
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 261 42 52 88-89 258 26 52
PARK VIEW
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 284 59 71 88-89 272 33 65
PIUTE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 237 20 33 88-89 240 17 38
Las Virgenes Unified
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 341 80 97 88-89 335 75 95
LINDERO CANYON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 354 88 97 88-89 331 72 94
WRIGHT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 327 68 92 88-89 340 79 95
Los Angeles Unified
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 208 30 15 88-89 202 21 16
BYRD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 216 24 17 88-89 193 6 10
COLUMBUS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 227 38 26 88-89 218 26 21
FROST
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 232 15 30 88-89 224 8 25
FULTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 194 28 8 88-89 190 26 10
HALE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 253 11 45 88-89 262 16 57
HENRY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 218 10 18 88-89 245 22 42
HOLMES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 224 15 23 88-89 240 13 38
IRVING
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 205 34 12 88-89 204 34 15
LAWRENCE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 254 51 46 88-89 241 47 39
MACLAY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 167 9 3 88-89 165 9 3
MADISON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 198 13 10 88-89 218 29 21
MILLIKAN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 256 52 48 88-89 234 25 32
MT. GLEASON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 217 21 18 88-89 223 23 24
MULHOLLAND
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 199 8 10 88-89 197 5 12
NOBEL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 258 21 50 88-89 243 4 41
NORTHRIDGE JUNIOR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 202 18 11 88-89 223 44 24
OLIVE VISTA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 201 24 11 88-89 206 32 15
PACOIMA JUNIOR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 205 36 12 88-89 185 10 8
PARKMAN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 252 16 45 88-89 244 11 41
PORTER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 300 89 81 88-89 266 29 61
PORTOLA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 267 33 57 88-89 254 6 49
REED
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 238 34 34 88-89 241 22 39
SAN FERNANDO JUNIOR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 161 5 3 88-89 171 11 4
SEPULVEDA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 279 87 67 88-89 268 8 62
SHERMAN OAKS CES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 275 25 64 88-89 258 6 54
SUN VALLEY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 223 61 22 88-89 197 31 12
SUTTER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 219 12 19 88-89 213 7 19
VALLEY ALTERNATIVE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 265 32 55 88-89 286 48 75
VAN NUYS JUNIOR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 205 40 12 88-89 195 14 10
Palmdale
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 259 65 50 88-89 243 36 40
JUNIPER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 269 81 59 88-89 240 42 38
SAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 252 46 45 88-89 245 31 42
Soledad-Agua Dulce Union
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 246 11 40 88-89 261 32 57
HIGH DESERT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 246 11 39 88-89 261 32 56
Westside Union
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 258 31 49 88-89 270 40 65
DEL SUR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 240 19 35 88-89 237 32 35
WALKER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 262 33 52 88-89 277 42 69
William S. Hart Union
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 300 55 82 88-89 291 42 81
ARROYO SECO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 295 45 77 88-89 287 36 76
PLACERITA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 323 75 91 88-89 297 37 83
SIERRA VISTA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 286 43 72 88-89 288 52 77
Wilsona
DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 236 27 30 88-89 259 55 55
CHALLENGER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 236 27 32 88-89 259 55 55
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.