. . . While Clothestime Ad Is a No-Show . . .
- Share via
For Clothestime, which is struggling to bolster revenue so it can successfully exit U.S. Bankruptcy Court, getting in consumers’ faces meant first getting in the face of television executives--who responded by refusing to run a racy Clothestime commercial.
Armed with its rejection slips, Clothestime then declared war on the television networks. The Anaheim-based company alleged that television executives were hypocrites because they run hours of shows filled with murder and mayhem--but wouldn’t air its simple commercial.
Clothestime maintained that its “natural reaction” commercials--which portray a young man who’s apparently in the process of getting physically aroused by the sight of a woman--were created with “the goal of boosting the retailer’s sagging fortunes.”
According to the company’s news releases, the next advertisement in the planned series will feature a cross dresser. And, Clothestime said it will soon unveil the name of a celebrity model--but there’s been no word on whether it will be RuPaul.
Of interest: Clothestime’s racy advertising is handled by the same advertising agency--Mendelsohn/Zien Advertising--that created Carl’s Jr.’s “in your face” advertisements.
*
Greg Johnson covers retail businesses and restaurants for The Times. He can be reached at (714) 966-5950 and at [email protected]
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.