Letters to the Editor: Fires happen. Why are we still building homes out of wood?
![Homes burn near Altadena Drive and New York Drive in Altadena due to the Eaton fire](https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/c58f00e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2338x1554+0+0/resize/1200x798!/quality/75/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F72%2F37%2Fc5b71a984cdca506d8620def1a0e%2Fla-me-eaton-fire-1.jpg)
- Share via
To the editor: Right now in Los Angeles, we are seeing what happens when we build homes with wood framing instead of tilt-up steel reinforced cement walls that would be more fire-resistant. (“2 dead and more than 1,000 homes, businesses, other buildings destroyed in L.A. County fires,” Jan. 8)
We citizens are too stupid to insist on building codes that are truly fire-resistant. Of course, we would still need to meet earthquake standards, which could be done with steel-reinforced cement materials even better than wood-frame structures.
If we are smart, we should encourage those who are losing their homes now to rebuild fire-resistant. Insurance companies should welcome that approach. As experience is gained with fire-resistant homes, they will probably be less expensive.
One of the companies I worked for years ago was in a tilt-up cement facility that I believed was very safe and surely fire-resistant. The technology exists; we just need to revise our building codes to encourage more fire-resistant structures.
Douglas M. Chapman, Santa Ana